Jussie Smollett sues Chicago claiming malicious prosecution over alleged beating


(Reuters) – Jussie Smollett has filed a lawsuit accusing Chicago of maliciously prosecuting him after concluding the actor’s claim that he was the victim of a racist and homophobic beating on a city street was a hoax.

FILE PHOTO: Actor Jussie Smollett arrives at the Leighton Criminal Court Building in Chicago, Illinois, U.S., March 14, 2019. REUTERS/Kamil Krzaczynski

Smollett, 37, best known for his role on the Fox television drama “Empire,” made his accusation in a counterclaim filed on Wednesday, after the city sued him to recoup $130,106 in police overtime costs to investigate the beating claim.

The actor, who no longer appears on “Empire,” is seeking compensatory and punitive damages from the city, police officials and others for causing him “substantial economic damages as well as reputational harm, humiliation, mental anguish and extreme emotional distress.”

A spokesman for Chicago’s law department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Smollett, who is black and gay, ignited a social media firestorm after telling police on Jan. 29 that two masked men had thrown a noose around his neck, poured bleach on him and shouted racial and homophobic slurs, while expressing support for U.S. President Donald Trump.

Illinois prosecutors charged Smollett on Feb. 20 with making up the attack, including by hiring two brothers to stage it, and falsely reporting a “high-profile hate crime,” to draw publicity after becoming dissatisfied with his “Empire” salary.

But they dropped the criminal case on March 26, drawing anger from Chicago’s police department and then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who called it a “whitewash of justice.”

Smollett had pleaded not guilty to lying about the attack, and has long said he had been truthful about it.

Chicago nonetheless sought triple damages in its April 11 civil lawsuit to recoup overtime costs.

Smollett filed his counterclaim against the city, the brothers and a number of police officers and employees.

He accused police of trying to prosecute him based on the brothers’ “false, self-serving and unreliable statements in order to close the investigation into the attack.”

Smollett also said Chicago could not recover investigative costs because it already accepted his $10,000 “payment in full” in connection with the dismissal of the criminal case.

Without ruling on the merits, U.S. District Judge Virginia Kendall on Oct. 22 refused to dismiss Chicago’s civil lawsuit against Smollett, saying his high profile and “the extreme nature of the accusations” could explain the overtime costs.

The case is Chicago v. Smollett, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 19-04547.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky and Cynthia Osterman

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

IDF confirms ‘decline in forces’ in southern Gaza
Ukraine nuclear plant drone strike prompts warning over risks
Total solar eclipse plunges parts of Mexico into darkness
North America awed by total solar eclipse
MP targeted in Westminster honeytrap resigns party whip

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *